美国CNET放出松下V10等离子评测，咬紧先锋，死缠烂打呀！！

REMUX

松下Panasonic的V10系列的cnet評測剛出來不久，真的是一臺狂野的等離子電視呀，把先鋒咬得死死的！這臺V10在很多方面已經超過了先鋒的機子：（整體上還是先鋒更黑）这句别看漏了！！:victory: :victory: 在極其黑中的色彩表現比先鋒來得正，經CNET調試后，暗部色彩仍然保持濃郁，高度精準，沒有褪色，黯淡或是偏色問題！
　　另外，96HZ for 1080P/24 source的功能讓藍光播放來得及其順暢！Performance這一項得九分，緊緊咬住先鋒，死纏爛打呀！！！
　链接CNET:http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/panasonic-tc-p50v10/4505-6482_7-33490589.html?tag=centerColumnArea1.1
详细的评测和高清视频！
对不起各位兄弟刚才小弟搞错了，弄出笑话：黑色表现先锋还是无懈可击的！！！

[ 本帖最后由 REMUX 于 2009-6-10 23:17 编辑 ]

abysszhou1

现在的松下应该说基本赶上的最后一批KURO的水平,相差无几,
考虑到价格的话,应该是超越

dudulubao

期待V系列[s:6]

我是ngh913

再好的东西，到中国来都被松下这个狗日的给阉割得差不多了

REMUX

原帖由 abysszhou1 于 2009-6-10 21:30 发表
现在的松下应该说基本赶上的最后一批KURO的水平,相差无几,
考虑到价格的话,应该是超越

　CNET对这机子的评价真的很高，被评为“editor choice”

松枪

这几句什么意思啊，谁能翻译一下？
Black level:
the black areas and letterbox bars were darker than any of the other displays in our comparison, with those two exceptions: blacks were basically the same on the G10 and visibly deeper on the Pioneer

Color accuracy:
As a result saturation wasn't quite as lush as on our reference Pioneer, but it was still as good or better than the other models

Bright lighting:
The V10 and G10 share the same antireflective screen. It did a solid job attenuating ambient light and glare in our bright room--not quite as good as the Pioneer or Sony, but clearly better than the highly reflective Samsung.

真干掉先锋了？很强

REMUX

原帖由 我是ngh913 于 2009-6-10 21:42 发表
再好的东西，到中国来都被松下这个狗日的给阉割得差不多了

这台V10对于的就是去年的PZ880C，是升级版本，旗舰机种松下应该不会再做手脚的啦，放心吧！[s:89] [s:89]

ericcantone

原帖由 REMUX 于 2009-6-10 21:46 发表


这台V10对于的就是去年的PZ880C，是升级版本，旗舰机种松下应该不会再做手脚的啦，放心吧！[s:89] [s:89]  

V等于pz800
X才等于pz880

abysszhou1

原帖由 ericcantone 于 2009-6-10 21:48 发表


V等于pz800
X才等于pz880

X是PV系列

alpacino1982

我只看了Black Level那部分，上面说：In extremely dark scenes, such as the partial eclipse and night sky at the beginning of Chapter 20, or the shadows along the twilight temples in Chapter 21, the black areas and letterbox bars were darker than any of the other displays in our comparison, with those two exceptions: blacks were basically the same on the G10 and visibly deeper on the Pioneer, and compared to the LCDs and the Samsung plasma the V10 was easily darker.
不知道原文提到：“在最黑的部位比先鋒來得更黑”了吗？

abysszhou1

不过松下学谁不好,学SONY的偏红

abysszhou1

Black level: The V10 exhibited the best black level performance we've seen on any flat-panel HDTV aside from the G10 and the Pioneer. In extremely dark scenes, such as the partial eclipse and night sky at the beginning of Chapter 20, or the shadows along the twilight temples in Chapter 21, the black areas and letterbox bars were darker than any of the other displays in our comparison, with those two exceptions: blacks were basically the same on the G10 and visibly deeper on the Pioneer, and compared to the LCDs and the Samsung plasma the V10 was easily darker. As usual, with deep blacks came a picture with more pop, realism, and impact in both dark and brighter scenes, and the improved light output of the V10 in custom versus the G10 in THX made the V10 seem a bit more impactful in our darkened home theater.
比先锋更黑
Bright lighting: The V10 and G10 share the same antireflective screen. It did a solid job attenuating ambient light and glare in our bright room--not quite as good as the Pioneer or Sony, but clearly better than the highly reflective Samsung. The V10 did not preserve black levels in the bright light as well as any of the other non-Panasonic displays.

但在比较亮的地方,比不是先锋和SONY

[ 本帖最后由 abysszhou1 于 2009-6-10 22:06 编辑 ]

p992

真的么？有人可是说先锋技术压松下几年没问题呢[s:14]

alpacino1982

不是都说aside from了吗，怎么来个比先锋更黑了？

松枪

原帖由 松枪 于 2009-6-10 21:46 发表
这几句什么意思啊，谁能翻译一下？
Black level:
the black areas and letterbox bars were darker than any of the other displays in our comparison, with those two exceptions: blacks were basically the sa ...

机器翻译的：

黑电平：
黑人区和信箱酒吧被黑暗比任何其他显示在我们的比较，与这两个例外：黑人基本上是一样的十国集团和明显更深的先锋

色彩精确度：
由于不是很饱和的葱郁作为我们的参考先锋，但它仍然是良好或优于其他模型

明亮的灯光：
十国集团的V10和共享同一透屏幕。它没有扎扎实实地做好减轻环境光线和刺眼的光亮-房间不太一样好先锋或索尼，但显然优于高反射率的三星。

还是看不懂啊[s:43] [s:43]