UID203842
威望3
金钱23488
交易诚信度0
主题7
帖子228
注册时间2005-11-12
最后登录2017-9-27
初级会员
 
交易诚信度0
注册时间2005-11-12
|
马上注册 家电论坛,众多有奖活动等你来参与!
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册
x
原文在 http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/panasonic-tx-p42g10-tx-p42g10b-20090415146.htm
关于能耗的测评如下,型号P42G10
Power Consumption| Default [Standard] mode | 181 watts* | | Calibrated [Standard] mode | 235 watts | | Standby | 1 watt |
* The default factory settings in “Standard” [Viewing Mode] was unusually dim: luminance output measured at only 64 cd/m2 on a 100% stimulus windowed pattern. This is the reason why the power consumption of our Panasonic TX-P42G10 review sample was lower out-of-the-box than that after calibration.
人肉翻译
能耗| 默认 [标准] 模式 | 181 瓦* | | 校准 [标准] 模式 | 235 瓦 | | 待机 | 1瓦 |
* 出厂默认的标准模式出奇的暗: 在100%全屏幕图案的时候,亮度测量只有 64 cd/m2 . 这就是为什么测试样机在默认模式实测的时候能耗比调校后能耗要低的原因
另引,在Cnet的测评说
After calibration to equalize light output at 40ftl, the story changes quite a bit. On one hand, the TC-P46G10 (281 watts) is still more-efficient than the only other 1080p 46-inch plasma we've tested, Panasonic's TH-46PZ85U (329 watts). On the other hand, it fails to compete with like-size 2008 LCD models, such as the Sharp LC-46D85U (123 watts), the Samsung LN46A550 (101 watts), and the Sony KDL-46Z4100 (124 watts), each of which uses less than half as much power to produce the same amount of light.
也就是说,虽然G10能耗比之前的PDP好了很多(实测达到281watts),但是和08款的各品牌液晶相比(实测125watts以下),能耗还基本是液晶的两倍。。。。
[ 本帖最后由 siegfriedx 于 2009-4-20 20:29 编辑 ] |
|