UID110972
威望8
金钱55441
交易诚信度0
主题8
帖子343
注册时间2005-1-8
最后登录2014-2-21
禁止发言
交易诚信度0
注册时间2005-1-8
|
原帖由 HiDV 于 2006-3-23 23:17 发表
Panavision不是Panasonic!!!
您最好还是了解一下,在胶片时代Panavision是干吗的?
若以ARRI的胶片机和Panavision比,根本不是一个档次!!
Panavision的胶片机是电影人的顶级追求!!!它的定 ...
俺的确这方面是外行,不过你说的也是放屁!
俺上到www.cinematography.com上面看了看,打入了Panavision Vs Arri发现根本就不是你说的那回事,客观感觉两个牌子都很牛!
贴几个专业电影摄像师的回帖,你自己看看吧!
(引用一)
Arri vs Panavision? if you live in LA Panavision Hollywood and Woodland Hills can offer you some amazing resources and has fabulous customer service, outside of LA it depends on who the Panavision vendor is and how together they are.
When all is said and done no one will be able to tell what camera you used. Unless it is malfunctioning in some way it does not affect the image. It's the lenses.
Primo's, Cooke s4's, and Ultraprimes are all excellent lenses. There are some subtle differences but I don't think there is much point in arguing which is sharper at least in the mid range focal lengths.
There are 2 places where Panavison lenses rules supreme.
1st is the highspeed zooms. the PMZ 14.5 - 50 T2.2 and the SLZ 17-75 T2.3. both perform beautifully and you can think about shooting your whole movie on them. Their dimensions are reasonable too. ( however the 17-75 is not so good for super 35 as it does not cover the corner area very well)
2nd is Anamorphic. Panavison has a huge selection of anamorphic lenses and is actively designing and manufactuing more all the time. People like Dan Sasaki and Guy Mc Vicker have lot of practical knowledge about anamorphic optics and they can help you select the right lenses for your project.
(引用二)
There is nothing like the extreme engineering that composes the arri cameras. The German are amazing, like always.
p.s. ive never had any trouble with the "active displacement type" to load the Aatons. The XTRprod is the one to blame for Aaton's bad loading fame, it is like a puzzle to load/unload that thing.
sorry for lousy english |
|