图片对比：夏普 LC-G5C32U vs. 飞利浦 32PF7320a

旭龙

Pictures 图片（左为夏普，右为飞利浦）
You can see the backlight difference here. Also, notice the philips is brighter overall背光灯不一样，飞利浦更亮。








This is the most incriminating evidence that the black is black on sharp.. and yes the Sharp tv is turned on (notice the green power light). While the philips is slightly less bright than the picture shows (my camera isn't perfect) you can tell from the above pictures, those are pretty accurate in terms of how it looks.以下的图片非常明显地显示出，夏普的“黑”更为纯正，飞利浦则有略微发白（由于相机原因，发白程度比照片所示要轻）。


[ 本帖最后由 旭龙 于 2005-10-19 11:32 编辑 ]

旭龙

Settings
Sharp: Noise Reduction:Low, Sharpness:0, Backlight:-7
Philips: DNR:Max, Sharpness:3, Brightness:30
*note: i turned down backlight and brightness to settings i would normally watch at and not at the lowest settings to prove a point*

Observations
PQ is pretty good for an LCD, Equal to my old Sony 27" or better. I think a lot ppl haven't used the settings to really enhance the picture. HD picture and SD picture require different settings because they are different settings coming through.

One thing is for sure, without any kind of Digital Noise Reduction on either TV the SD picture looks like crap. This is b/c (i assume) they are displaying a poor signal and magnifying the defects.

With everything calibrated, I chose several channels or at least the channels that i thought were better quality programs (sports, c-span, cops, tbs). Both pictures look good.

Sharpness: Philips is sharper in SD, Sharp has a "softer" image, blended together so you may or may not like that... however, it's odd that some images display sharpness in certain areas of the picture and softness on the edges.

Color: Philips looks good, I still haven't adjusted the sharp since there are a total of 18 RGB settings that I can choose. Out of the box though, I would say they both push certain colors.

Overall, both look pretty good for SD. I'm not sure why they would be horrible unless it's not calibrated.

Black Comparison

The blacks on the Sharp has controls for backlight AND brightness
The Philips only has brightness and does not affect the backlight (very minimally)

Observations
There is a clear winner here as you will see from the pictures. Sharp wins by a landslide. Properly calibrated, the sharp really blows the Philips away. I hope no one judges these TVs in store since everyone should know that the settings are on vivid or set improperly.

I hope my pictures show the difference but basically, the philips is a lot whiter compared to the sharp. No details are lost in the picture in dark modes. The philip blends the black but it seems that the details are lost.

tumbler

我觉得夏普的屏在色彩还原上更真实一些。

旭龙

原帖由 tumbler 于 2005-10-19 11:38 发表
我觉得夏普的屏在色彩还原上更真实一些。

好像飞利浦的肤色要比夏普好不止一点点啊。

china521

一个冷色调，一个暖色调，怎么比啊

狂风007

飞机的ＰＦ３２０好象是低端机吧，应该把ＬＤ３００拿来比[s:14]

yingease

原帖由 旭龙 于 2005-10-19 11:39 发表

好像飞利浦的肤色要比夏普好不止一点点啊。

参数设置都是一样的吗？？？！！！

啦啦卡卡

不能这样比的啊~~~~~~~~~

王杨

原帖由 tumbler 于 2005-10-19 11:38 发表
我觉得夏普的屏在色彩还原上更真实一些。

连准确的颜色都分辨不出，去看看眼睛吧。[s:14]

狂风007

夏葡的颜色失真比较明显

艾瑞克

喜欢飞机的色彩！

两台机的色温差太多，这样无法比较

雪花重现

支持版主,好.给那些自认夏普好的网友清楚一枪,

komatsu

这样也能比较，还是到现场比较吧，最好带一张自己熟悉的DVD碟片，有条件的带上笔记本放一下720P的高清电影，绝对是夏普胜出！
PS，记得旭龙版主作过一期测评吧？结果不也是SHARP的色彩比飞利普好吗？

kagren009

和目前的Sharp比色彩，没一个能行的吧。但飞机的背光灯确实很亮