就象跑步着地方法被跑步鞋商误导一样，音响发烧友被音响厂商所误导

AV风暴

他们目标是一致的，手段是相同的！

（以下内容来之网络）跑步着地的正确方法——前脚掌先着地

关于在长跑中，应该是后脚跟先落地，还是前脚掌这个问题，可谓众说纷纭。总体上来说，几乎一边倒地支持后脚跟先落地，y0utube上的不少视频也如此推荐。此文是译者在搜索中找到的，提法比较有意思

THE CORRECT WAY OF LANDING IN RUNNING - ON THE BALL OF THE FOOT
跑步着地的正确方法——前脚掌先着地
Why is there a battle over how we are supposed to land in running? Why has sucha seemingly simple question become so complicated and the subject ofdiscussion? During the running boom of the 70-ies through the 90-ies it haѕbecome a well-known and well-established opinion that landing on the heel isthe only option to run properly, with less injuries, more economically, etc.Any other options were rejected for no obvious reasons or for some made upreasons such as: landing on the forefoot is only suitable for elite runners,etc.

为什么会有关于跑步中着地方式的争论呢？为什么这么一个看起来简单的问题会变得如此复杂而富有争议性？自70年代至90年代，跑步开始流行，就有一套为人熟知而且完整的理论，认为脚跟先着地是正确跑步的不二选择，据说这样才使伤害减少，且更加经济等等。其他的着地方式都被驳倒，却没有明确的理由，或者只有一些杜撰的理由，例如：前脚掌着地的方式只适合专业跑步运动员。
Well, there was no scientific proof or any existing experience to back up thisopinion, but still it stayed. Medical and science community seriously talkabout "cushioning" by landing on the heel. And what was not evenfunny, they considered the heel's pad, with a tiny fat layer there to be meantfor cushioning!! Alleluia! Where does it come from? Are you out of your mind?Since when are bones meant to be used as cushioning tissues? We can't reallytalk about fat on the heel as cushioning. If you want to check it for yourself,please, go out and run barefoot on the asphalt on your heels. It'll be a goodreality check and will clean up a mess in your mind.

这个观点广泛存在，却没有科学证据或者现有经验来支撑。医学和科学组织不无严肃地提及脚后跟着地时的缓冲。这并不像是在开玩笑，他们考虑到脚后跟的“衬垫”，有一小块脂肪层可以作为缓冲之用！哈里路亚！这究竟从哪里来的？真是你脑瓜想出来的吗？什么时候骨头可以用作缓冲组织了？我们决不可认为后脚跟的脂肪有缓冲作用。如果你想亲自验证一下，拜托，赤着脚，用你的后脚跟，到外面的柏油马路去跑步。这是一个很好的事实证明，相信可以厘清你混乱的思维。
This, generally accepted and established opinion, was spread out by media andcoaching, through the books and magazines, and taught at differentpresentations, clinics and camps. Yes, it also became the philosophy and hardc0re politics: "This is what we think is right, and there is nothing todiscuss here anymore". I would say that temporarily, in a specific fieldof human activity, we lost our freedom to speak about any other vision on thissubject. So the majority of runners accepted this, never proved opinion, astheir only reality. Numbers speakѕ by themselves - the heel-striking communitymake up about 80-85% of running population.

这个被广泛接受而确定的观点，经媒体和教练的的传播，在书籍、杂志、各类讲座、诊所和训练营中随处可见。没错，它已经变成了哲理和强硬的规条：“我们认为这是正确无误的，没有商量的余地。”我暂且这样说，在人类活动的这个领域内，我们失去了对这个话题发表任何其他意见的自由。所以，大多数的跑步者接受了这个观点，一个从未被证明的观点，将其作为唯一的事实。数据表明——后脚跟先着地的人占跑步者人数的80%～85%。
There is nothing funny here at all, as the officially recognized statistics ofannually injured runners, according to ACSM data, is about the same - 85%.Isn't it an incredible coincidence? Unfortunately, this is no coincidence, itis the cause and effect data. If we do believe in such things, then we have to acceptthe fact that such high rate of injuries comes from doing something wrong. It'slike violating the traffic rules would bring our car to collision and us toinjuries as a consequence. Nobody doubts such coincidence in driving of cars,but in running our injuries are almost looked upon as an act of God.

根据ACSM的数据，官方承认的统计表明，每年受伤的跑步者比率也是同一个数字——85%，这一点不是开玩笑。这只是一个惊人的巧合吗？很不幸，并非巧合。这是一组内含因果关系的数据。如果我们真的确信这些数据，我们就必须接受这样一个事实：如此高比率的伤者是因为我们犯了一些错误。就好像破坏交通规则的后果是车毁人伤一样。没有人会怀疑这些在驾驶中的后果，然而在跑步方面，我们的受伤却大多被看作是上帝使然。
Why didn't we question if heel striking were good for running for so long? Myguess is that it was kind of brain washing done by running shoes manufacturingcompanies. They needed to develop an easily manipulated market and they tookthe easiest way to do it. Their proposed way wasn't related with our educationand skill development, but on the opposite: with our laziness and our desire tofind a quick solution for our problems. So instead of developing the skill ofmovement, they proposed "protection" through all kinds of cushioning,stability, motion control, etc., shoes. Wow! Sounds as something even betterthan the divine project - human beings with billions of cells in our brains,incredible complexity nervous and cardio-vascular systems, our muscles and bonesoperated by our nervous system, etc.

为什么长时间以来，我们都不怀疑后脚跟着地的方式是否真的对跑步有好处呢？我的猜想是，我们都在一定程度上被跑步鞋制造商洗脑了。他们需要建立一个容易操控的市场，而他们采取最简单的方法实现了它。他们采取的方法与我们教育或者技能发展无关，相反，是从我们的懒惰和我们急功近利的心理下手。因此，他们鼓吹通过各种诸如缓冲、稳定或者动作控制等等的跑鞋，来提供“保护”，而不是在动作上提高技巧。哇塞！听起来这简直像是神圣的工程——有着万亿细胞的人类头脑，无比复杂的神经和心血管系统，肌肉和骨骼受神经系统控制等等。
If we take the shoe companies approach, then they have developed somethingbetter than our Creator. Of course I can't accept this, and who will? So thequestion of how to land in running popped up again in its purest form. Why dowe do it in this, and not in that way? The answer is as simple as Nature.Everything should be done in the way our Nature requests, or to be moreprecise: nature demands. In running, as in all other movement, it is all aboutgravity. To use gravity we have to fall forward from the vertical position,because it is the only one from which it could happen and for this matter wehave no other choice as to start from the ball of the foot.

如果我们相信制鞋公司的那一套，那么他们已经创造出了——造物主也无法创造出的——神物。当然，我不相信这一套，鬼才相信呢！因此，关于在跑步中如何着地的问题，应以最纯粹的形式再次被提出。为什么我们用这种形式着地，而非那种？答案是显而易见的。做所有事情时，都应以我们自然需求的方式，或者更精确点来说，以我们本能的方式。跑步时，就如其他所有的动作，全与重力有关。为了利用重力，我们必须在垂直方向向前落脚，因为这是唯一方法。也因此，除了从前脚掌开始，我们别无选择。
I was running around this notion for over 30 years and didn't find any othersolution. Nature always comes back to this point in order to produce movementin this environment. It is like saying, "Please, do not waste your timeand efforts, if you want to use/consume gravity, get into this position as soonas possible and be as precise as possible".

我跑步已经超过30年了，一直秉承着这个概念，除此以外我并未发现有其他的方法。为了在这个环境下产生运动，“自然”始终尤显重要。它似乎在说：“拜托，别浪费你的时间和精力了，如果你想利用或者克服重力，尽快采取这种姿势吧，越精准越好。”
We are getting more and more proof for this matter and a recent Ph.D. of GrahamFletcher confirms this idea, too, which existed from time of creation. Whyshould we neglect it?

我们正采集更多的关于此观点的证据，Graham Fletcher最近的报告也佐证了这个自创世以来就存在的定律。为什么我们要无视它呢？
Dr.Romanov

Romanov博士

AV风暴

交易区新帖推荐

如前后级分体、左右声道分体、夸张的机壳、超粗超纯的导线、超低的失真、巨大的功率等等。

音乐贵族

按照你所说，你应该是个音色党，。音染和失真让你永远不知道帕瓦罗蒂的声音是怎样的，。
人有好坏高低，厂商也是如此。
什么事都一刀切，是十分不合理的。

2014zz

好多英文！！！