cnet关于w900a的评测出来了

HUNK_MrDeath

memyself 发表于 2013-5-29 19:40
F8000比W900便宜500美刀？这不科学啊！老美真幸福

好像是w900a在美帝那儿卖的太贵了。（也可能是w900a在天朝缩水了)

xapxl

:victory:

mmch

啊.. 唉，牌子还是对三星无爱啊。

memyself

The good: The Sony KDL-55W900A features some of the best colors available on an LCD; black levels and shadow details are fairly good and not at the expense of a consistent gamma; sleek design; solid features including four pairs of active 3D glasses.
The bad: Very expensive; available only in a 55-inch size; the Panasonic VT60 plasma is a much better buy; picture quality not as good as last year's midrange HX850; some strange artifacts in 3D.
The bottom line: The Sony W900A is a fine television, but its Triluminos technology pushes the price way beyond competitiveness.

还是不要断章取义的好，通篇看完，吐槽点就是太贵了。拿HX850的退市价和W900A的上市价比....
看评论： The hx850 was $2599 when it was newly released then was dropped to $1999 The w900a is starting at $2799.99. The review seems to compare prices poorly.

关于画质的槽点也就是黑位不够好，比不上HX850，这里我感觉浑然天成的大猩猩玻璃立功了，同样的侧入式职能背光，2台机器的就差一块玻璃。
Despite local dimming, however, it isn't quite as good as last year's HX850 in the most important area: black levels. The W900's black areas were slightly lighter in some scenes, and the edges were prone to light leakage. Though gamma levels were more consistent from light to dark than the cheaper W802, it was a little more hesitant to show up shadow detail.

画质8分， 价格5分：总分：6.7. 8分已经属于较高的画质，价格拖了很大的后腿。 看看F8000北美的价格吧！ 国内是三星太不厚道，还是Sony太厚道了呢？ 11000买到W900的绝对讨了大便宜啊 {:soso_e128:}。如果说国内W900缩水，那难道国内的F8000加量了嘛？{:soso_e113:}

trabbit

HUNK_MrDeath 发表于 2013-5-29 17:02
论坛里不是一直说w900a（画质同w950a）比三星f8000好吗

都是被索粉喷的

chncwk

HUNK_MrDeath 发表于 2013-5-29 17:02
论坛里不是一直说w900a（画质同w950a）比三星f8000好吗

你在哪看到的，我看你是论坛里第一个放这种炮的人吧。

wkz

跟美国价格比，F8000定价其实是正常的。倒是W900a有点搞不懂，在美国卖2800美元，折算成人民币应该18000左右的，可国内只卖11000。目前只知道w900a在日本用的是ips屏，在国内用的是台湾的va屏，缩水确实有，但应该不至于有价格差距那么大。