家电论坛

广告合作
 注册  找回密码

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

手机号码,快捷登录

手机号码,快捷登录

楼主: as_dw

[等离子] 三星d8000 等离子 苏宁报价

[复制链接]

1

主题

34

帖子

0

威望

新手上路

Rank: 1

交易诚信度
0
注册时间
2011-4-27
发表于 2011-5-20 22:20 | 显示全部楼层
这价格就等松下vt31报价了
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

3

主题

160

帖子

0

威望

初级会员

Rank: 2Rank: 2

交易诚信度
0
注册时间
2008-12-9
发表于 2011-5-20 22:26 | 显示全部楼层
D8000应该和st30、gt30差不多水准。
所以松下不在天朝上60、65st30c的话,大屏幕市场必然被三星抢去的。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

21

主题

2214

帖子

1

威望

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

交易诚信度
0
注册时间
2010-5-19
发表于 2011-5-20 22:31 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 wales 于 2011-5-20 22:26 发表
D8000应该和st30、gt30差不多水准。
所以松下不在天朝上60、65st30c的话,大屏幕市场必然被三星抢去的。


D8000应该强于ST30的,毕竟是三星的旗舰。[s:68]
http://att.jd-bbs.com/day_101104/20101104_682fe668fb2f7a1f4f38ezJ946bSz1f3.png
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

193

主题

6303

帖子

23

威望

高级会员

Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4

交易诚信度
0
注册时间
2009-10-24
发表于 2011-5-20 22:40 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 richzz 于 2011-5-20 22:31 发表


D8000应该强于ST30的,毕竟是三星的旗舰。[s:68]


D8000等离子在北美AVS FORUM和highdefjunkies两大论坛的评价来说,丝毫不比VT30差!而且很多观点还挺D8000,在肤色和画面通透度这里强于VT30!


下面是Chad B对两大机型的对比评测!在他看来D8000在肤色的画面通透感这里强于VT30!英语过关的TX认真看看!英语不行的,I'm sorry!。


65VT30 reviewed by Chad B and Comparison with Samsung PN-64D8000!!

Recently I had the opportunity to check out Panasonic's latest top of the line plasma, the 65" VT30, at Cleveland Plasma. The VT30 is a beautifully designed set, with a glass front covering the bezel and screen. Reflections are obvious and possibly distracting, though the screen does a very good job of remaining dark in moderate ambient light for a plasma. Sleek and super thin, the VT30 makes a positive impression right away.

The VT30 is the first plasma to feature- ahem- automatic calibration. I can hear the sales pitch now... "Yes, the VT30 actually will save you $400 bucks! Instead of hiring some high priced calibrator to tweak the picture, all you have to do is hook this baby to your laptop, and a few button clicks later you have a perfect picture!" All right, all right... It's not quite like that. Actually, the VT30's automatic calibration feature is really geared toward professional calibrators, intending to make their job more efficient and thorough. Working in conjunction with Spectracal's CalMAN Commercial (possible add ons for lower license levels are being reviewed by Spectracal) software and a meter, eventually the process will adjust the grayscale and gamma at 10 levels, among other things, and allow it all to be saved in a new ISF Day or Night picture preset that will be protected from accidental changes.

Before calibration:

After a few setup questions, the VT30 is ready to rock 'n roll in the Energy Star rated Standard picture mode. Well, maybe rock 'n roll isn't the best analogy for Standard mode. Mildly irritating elevator music may be more descriptive. Standard mode is quite grainy and uninvolving, and with a maximum light output of 4.7 fL, it's pretty hard to see objects like snow capped mountains, a hockey rink, a car's headlights, or a blazing sun in the picture.

Thankfully, once a better picture mode like Custom, THX, or Cinema is selected, the VT30's picture quality starts to show hints of it's stunning potential. Untouched Custom mode, with my familiar 1080P/24 Blu Ray demo material, had lots of pop and excitement. However, colors were over the top and too rich, and the picture was still quite grainy. People looked like they suffered chronic sunburn. I saw some odd motion/panning artifacts, and pans had that infamous Soap Opera smoothness. Overall, Custom mode offered a picture that initially was vivid and eye catching, but eventually became fatiguing and unnatural.

Though I did not view demo material in pre-calibrated Cinema or THX mode, the measurements suggest that either mode should provide a middle ground between the bland look of Standard and the over the top look of Custom. However, both Cinema and THX modes suffered from an emphasis of green in the white balance, which is subjectively the most unflattering direction in which to err. A simple change from Warm2 to Warm1 in the picture adjustments should alleviate that problem and provide a good overall image.

Calibration:

The review unit was a bit green, though Chris had it running the break in DVD for about 35 hours before I arrived. Having downloaded the latest version of CalMAN, I got the TV interfaced with my laptop and calibration gear to check out the automatic calibration feature. Unfortunately, at this stage of it's development, the feature proved to be useless for the most part. It did open up a new picture preset called ISF Day (Night would also be available), but unfortunately the 10 point white balance and grayscale adjustment was not available to select; only the 2 point white balance adjustment was available. Also, far too many necessary picture options and adjustments were grayed out, making even a 2 point calibration far from optimal. However, I did have it try the automatic calibration. What I ended up with was an ISF Day mode with a peak light output of only about 28 fL and a pretty good white balance, but poor performance in other aspects of the picture.

I did a lot of experimentation in Custom mode, since it has a fantastic variety of adjustments in the advanced user menu. Unfortunately, some of those controls just did not work. Most of the CMS adjustments were non functional, though I was able to adjust the luminance (out of luminance, hue, and saturation) of each color. Even with the luminance adjustment, however, things were not as they should be. Setting the color at one video level resulted in color compression at other levels. I tried to minimize the effect with different combinations of the master color control and the luminance adjustments, but could not entirely eliminate it. I also experimented with different panel brightness settings, which has had an impact on color linearity in past Panasonic models, with no success. I concluded that the color was going to be compromised in Custom mode, but I continued on in the hope that other aspects of performance might make up for it.
The gamma adjustment in Custom mode did have a 10 point detail adjustment. However, after a while of experimenting, I found I really was not making the improvements I had hoped for. It was like trying to climb up a slippery slope; I seemed to make a couple step of progress here and there, but soon found myself not far from where I started.
The VT30's ABL (auto brightness limiter) was fairly aggressive, allowing very small white objects to be bright enough, but severely limiting larger bright objects. All plasmas have this to a certain degree to limit power consumption and protect the panel, though less ABL interference results in a better image. I found a new adjustment for video type in the VT30's menu that did seem to make the ABL less obtrusive when set to photo or video (default was off), with no apparent disadvantage. It did increase blue in the white balance by a tiny bit, but not enough to be visible.

I found Cinema and THX modes to be the best starting points for calibration. Cinema mode had slightly better gamma, but it's light output was more limited than THX. For moderate ambient lighting conditions, THX seemed the best choice, though Cinema may be slightly better for a totally dark room. Because of it's slightly better versatility, I concentrated my efforts on THX mode.

As with some past Panasonic plasmas starting with the V10, supplying a 1080P/24 signal and engaging the 96 Hz mode resulted in subtle measured changes to the picture relative to 60 Hz mode. 96 Hz mode reduced light output very slightly, degraded the gamma a bit, and reduced blue in the white balance by a few percent. All of these changes were very subtle, and are not cause for too much concern. Also like the V10, engaging 96 Hz mode did have a positive impact on what might be thought to be an unrelated but important picture aspect: black level and contrast. While the VT30's black level was too low for my meter to read reliably even in 60 Hz mode, I could see a slight improvement or darkening of the black level when engaging 96 Hz. 96 Hz mode did introduce a tiny bit of flickering in some test patterns, but it was so slight and infrequent that it did not bother me at all with video.

I found that all of THX mode's user menu picture controls were pretty close to optimal, though I did raise contrast and lower sharpness both by a small amount. The biggest improvement in THX mode came from adjustment of the grayscale in the service menu.

Maximum light output after calibration in THX mode was about 38 fL with my usual small (10%) test windows. That is adequate for a light controlled room, but on the low side for most living rooms. With larger measurement windows, the white balance shifted slightly (reducing green along with other changes) and light output reduced to 35 fL with 18% medium windows and 32 fL with 25% large windows. With a 100% full field, maximum light output dropped to just over 12 fL.

After calibration:

After all the technical tests were complete, I put my familiar demo material in the Blu Ray player and sat back to enjoy the picture.

Pans and motion were surprisingly good, even with the VT30 in 60Hz mode. I was impressed with the lifelikeness of the image. However, colors lacked a tiny bit of richness; skin tones were natural but a bit too polite. There was a good but not quite excellent sense of depth, and shadow detail was strong and neutral toned. Try as I might, I saw no traces of DSE (dirty screen effect), contouring, or fluctuating black bars. There was very good pop in a dark room, though the picture was not terribly exciting with moderate lighting. Overall, I thought the image was very good, though a little lacking in "Wow!" factor. Looking back through my notes and calibration data, I believe the blame for the lack of excitement can be laid at the feet of the not fully developed calibration adjustments. With black level and contrast this good, the image should be oozing with pop and excitement. However, the lower than optimal gamma, slightly uneven color luminance with red being low, and tame light output seemed to combine to rob the image of some of it's edge. These are all things that could be eliminated if only the VT30's calibration flaws could be corrected. In fact, Custom mode appeared to bring a substantial boost in excitement and verve to the table at the expense of color and overall picture accuracy. If Custom mode's (or the auto-calibration ISF mode's) calibration flaws are corrected with a firmware update, we'll have a TV to really cheer about. As it is, I felt it was very good, but not living up to it's full potential.

Comparison with Samsung PN-64D8000:

I just happened to have a similar sized and freshly calibrated Samsung sitting right next to the VT30, so I couldn't resist a quick face-off. 1080P/24 HDMI from the Blu Ray player was sent to a high quality HDMI distribution amplifier, and both displays were calibrated to around 40 fL peak light output give or take a few percent. The room was totally dark except for at the very beginning. The Samsung was evaluated with Cinema Smooth turned off since it degrades the black level. Both 96 and 60 Hz modes were sampled on the VT30.

Lights on, power off:
The VT30 was a little more reflective. Both plasmas stayed fairly dark, retaining good contrast with moderate ambient light.

Lights off, test patterns:
The D8000 looked brighter and a purer white when displaying a full white field.
Looking at a moving white bar, I was able to see slight signs of the DSE on the D8000: the movement of the bar caused the screen to appear to have dirty fingerprints or smudges on it. The effect was only noticeable with this test pattern.
With a very dark PLUGE image, I could see the VT30's blacks were just barely darker to the eye in 60 Hz mode. It was such a slight difference, though, that I would definitely not be able to see it except in this instance where they were side by side in a pitch black room. However, the VT30's blacks became slightly darker with the 96 Hz mode engaged, and the difference became easier to identify.
A gray ramp looked a little off-white on the VT30 and purer on the D8000. The optimal brightness setting floated by about 1 click worth on the D8000 depending on the picture content, though neither the D8000 nor the VT30 were rock solid.

Lights off, video material:
I saw that shadow detail was exaggerated but neutral toned on the VT30. Dark suits and hair were not quite as dark as I was used to seeing them, which could be a good or bad thing depending on your room lighting. On reference grade material in a dark room, it looked a bit on the washed out side of neutral.
The D8000's presentation was a little more exciting and detailed.
Because Cinema Smooth was turned off, the D8000's pans were a little herky-jerky. The VT30's pans and motion looked good in both 60 Hz and 96 Hz modes, though 96 Hz mode is more correct for most Blu Ray material.
The D8000's flesh tones were nearly spot on at first (just a tiny bit too pink), and with a slight tweak of the red CMS adjustment I was able to get incredible flesh tones. On the other hand, the VT30's flesh tones were a little less rich and a little too bland, though they were unoffensive. If you routinely find yourself reducing color, the VT30 would be more to your liking.
I looked very closely at the letterbox bars on a 2.40:1 movie and couldn't see any floating blacks on the VT30. However, there was some subtle pumping going on above black; a slight dynamic action in the grayscale and gamma as APL changed. That's not too uncommon in plasmas, but some are more stable. The D8000 was similar.
With bright images the D8000 came away looking purer and more detailed. For instance, clouds just looked more true to life on the D8000, and some of the daylight scenes in The Dark Knight had more detail and verve.

Conclusion:

This is an excellent set, though it is hampered by non functional and not fully developed adjustments. For now, it produces a very good but somewhat unexciting image, though some firmware fixes could easily transform the VT30 into a jaw-dropping beauty.

Updates:

I've been told ControlCAL has a profile for the VT30 with a working 10 point grayscale adjustment. I will edit this post with updates when I get to test any new software or firmware.

[ 本帖最后由 潜龙谍影snake 于 2011-5-20 22:41 编辑 ]
SONY第三代头戴式3D显示器HMZ-T3终于发布咯!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

193

主题

6303

帖子

23

威望

高级会员

Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4

交易诚信度
0
注册时间
2009-10-24
发表于 2011-5-20 22:48 | 显示全部楼层
玩电视的,要不懂基本的英语,那真的是一种损失!CNET US和AVFORUMS那边有很多机器的参数设定,效果真的很赞!看不懂的话,就没辙了。
SONY第三代头戴式3D显示器HMZ-T3终于发布咯!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

21

主题

2214

帖子

1

威望

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

交易诚信度
0
注册时间
2010-5-19
发表于 2011-5-21 08:36 | 显示全部楼层
潜龙,帮我看一下CNET US和AVFORUMS 里,是否有关于D8000的屏噪电流声之类的反映,记得前代的C7000有这个毛病。 谢谢![s:21]
http://att.jd-bbs.com/day_101104/20101104_682fe668fb2f7a1f4f38ezJ946bSz1f3.png
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

10

主题

148

帖子

0

威望

初级会员

Rank: 2Rank: 2

交易诚信度
0
注册时间
2010-6-18
发表于 2011-5-21 10:01 | 显示全部楼层

回复 20# 潜龙谍影snake 的帖子

这个不存在吧,能买旗舰的买个eye one就行了.还能校正显示器,不存在浪费.上论坛的都是些折腾的主,这个不是问题.
至于不上论坛的,被商场宰的那部分钱都不只一个eye one了
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

21

主题

2214

帖子

1

威望

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

交易诚信度
0
注册时间
2010-5-19
发表于 2011-5-21 19:11 | 显示全部楼层
顶上去[s:68]
http://att.jd-bbs.com/day_101104/20101104_682fe668fb2f7a1f4f38ezJ946bSz1f3.png
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

10

主题

272

帖子

0

威望

初级会员

Rank: 2Rank: 2

交易诚信度
0
注册时间
2006-2-5
发表于 2011-5-21 20:23 | 显示全部楼层
估计偶等不了国庆
大概8月要买64的了
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

21

主题

2214

帖子

1

威望

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

交易诚信度
0
注册时间
2010-5-19
发表于 2011-5-21 20:25 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 黑色午夜 于 2011-5-21 20:23 发表
估计偶等不了国庆
大概8月要买64的了


64是必须的,我在不到3米的视距,感觉55寸的很小。[s:11]
http://att.jd-bbs.com/day_101104/20101104_682fe668fb2f7a1f4f38ezJ946bSz1f3.png
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

2

主题

43

帖子

5

威望

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

交易诚信度
0
注册时间
2005-6-16
QQ
发表于 2011-5-21 21:24 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 as_dw 于 2011-5-20 20:35 发表
今天晚上去苏宁看三星d8000 59寸 等离子  报的是19999  然后10倍积分 相当于1000元 还可以家电以旧换新  不知道这个价位合适不??10一不知道能不能降价?

无知的不知道这个系列有59寸的人飘过,另求真相!!!![s:16] [s:16]
家电君子
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

193

主题

6303

帖子

23

威望

高级会员

Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4

交易诚信度
0
注册时间
2009-10-24
发表于 2011-5-21 21:44 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 richzz 于 2011-5-21 08:36 发表
潜龙,帮我看一下CNET US和AVFORUMS 里,是否有关于D8000的屏噪电流声之类的反映,记得前代的C7000有这个毛病。 谢谢![s:21]

今天看到64D8000的画质了。东莞这边还没上架,报31999,只能做30999,连官方29999的价格都做不到!


机子的亮度比去年的C7000有提高,但幅度很有限(看3D时,亮度还是不给力,偏暗,偏黄)。另外一个就是人物脸部肤色偏红,我通过后期的参数调整后有所改进,


但相比去年C7000自然清新的肤色表现还是略逊一筹。今年这台D8000还有一个缺点,画质有点冷,整体背景偏蓝了,湛蓝,湛蓝的那个感觉,


这个就算是降低色温后,改进依然非常有限。感觉今年三星的机子色彩比起去年来说,有所退步!就拿D8000液晶吧,也是偏粉,偏红!


按我个人的观感来说,去年的C6900的画质都比他好。去年三星画质最棒的一台是65C8000,很漂亮,很养眼,但无奈,价格太贵了。

[ 本帖最后由 潜龙谍影snake 于 2011-5-21 21:48 编辑 ]
SONY第三代头戴式3D显示器HMZ-T3终于发布咯!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

193

主题

6303

帖子

23

威望

高级会员

Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4

交易诚信度
0
注册时间
2009-10-24
发表于 2011-5-21 21:55 | 显示全部楼层
AVS那边现在大部分VT30用户反映出来的都是挺失望的,离他们预期的效果有一段距离!MLL的退步,其实很多人还是挺在意,挺揪心的,毕竟黑色的冲击力减退了。


另外,画面在噪点和色彩方面比起去年的VT20进步不大(在抑制噪点这方面有进步,但暗部色彩有所退步,色彩的精准性欠缺)。


反倒是ST30的用户反映说机器不错(不知道是不是本来的预期没那么高,所以不会造成落差)。GT30那边则在为Fluctuating Brightness Problem烦恼。
SONY第三代头戴式3D显示器HMZ-T3终于发布咯!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

10

主题

1717

帖子

1

威望

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

交易诚信度
0
注册时间
2010-5-2
发表于 2011-5-21 21:56 | 显示全部楼层
好!三星可以逞能下了!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

21

主题

2214

帖子

1

威望

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

交易诚信度
0
注册时间
2010-5-19
发表于 2011-5-21 22:47 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 潜龙谍影snake 于 2011-5-21 21:44 发表

今天看到64D8000的画质了。东莞这边还没上架,报31999,只能做30999,连官方29999的价格都做不到!


机子的亮度比去年的C7000有提高,但幅度很有限(看3D时,亮度还是不给力,偏暗,偏黄)。另外一个就是人物脸 ...


是的,今天看的55D7000,感觉颜色就有点粉。
http://att.jd-bbs.com/day_101104/20101104_682fe668fb2f7a1f4f38ezJ946bSz1f3.png
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|手机版|客服:010-60152166 邮箱:zx@jd-bbs.com QQ:895456697|广告合作|账号注销|家电联盟网

京公网安备 11010602010207号 ( 京ICP证041102号,京ICP备09075138号-9 )

GMT+8, 2026-4-8 01:54 , Processed in 0.120728 second(s), 22 queries , Gzip On.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表